TABLE : Q1 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Agree with overall vision for the future of Crystal Palace Park?,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly agree,828,38,866,,
,34%,32%,34%,,
Agree,1138,42,1180,,
,47%,35%,46%,For,80%
Neither,183,11,194,,
,7%,9%,8%,,
Disagree,112,12,124,,
,5%,10%,5%,,
Strongly disagree,89,12,101,,
,4%,10%,4%,Against,9%
Not answered,92,4,96,,
,4%,3%,4%,,
TABLE : Q2a PAGE : 1,,,,,
Metropolitan park,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Very appropriate,1859,84,1943,,
,76%,71%,76%,,
Reasonably appropriate,370,19,389,,
,15%,16%,15%,For,91%
Neutral,89,8,97,,
,4%,7%,4%,,
Not very appropriate,19,0,19,,
,1%,0%,1%,,
Not at all appropriate,19,4,23,,
,1%,3%,1%,Against,2%
Not answered,86,4,90,,
,4%,3%,4%,,
TABLE : Q2b PAGE : 1,,,,,
Sports and events park,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Very appropriate,1314,66,1380,,
,54%,55%,54%,,
Reasonably appropriate,737,30,767,,
,30%,25%,30%,For,84%
Neutral,218,11,229,,
,9%,9%,9%,,
Not very appropriate,59,7,66,,
,2%,6%,3%,,
Not at all appropriate,29,0,29,,
,1%,0%,1%,Against,4%
Not answered,85,5,90,,
,3%,4%,4%,,
TABLE : Q2c PAGE : 1,,,,,
"Environmentally, socially and economically sustainable",,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Very appropriate,1628,67,1695,,
,67%,56%,66%,,
Reasonably appropriate,500,25,525,,
,20%,21%,20%,For,87%
Neutral,125,14,139,,
,5%,12%,5%,,
Not very appropriate,38,2,40,,
,2%,2%,2%,,
Not at all appropriate,40,6,46,,
,2%,5%,2%,Against,3%
Not answered,111,5,116,,
,5%,4%,5%,,
TABLE : Q2d PAGE : 1,,,,,
Accessible to everybody,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Very appropriate,1869,75,1944,,
,77%,63%,76%,,
Reasonably appropriate,378,29,407,,
,15%,24%,16%,For,92%
Neutral,90,9,99,,
,4%,8%,4%,,
Not very appropriate,15,0,15,,
,1%,0%,1%,,
Not at all appropriate,14,1,15,,
,1%,1%,1%,Against,1%
Not answered,76,5,81,,
,3%,4%,3%,,
TABLE : Q2e PAGE : 1,,,,,
Wide range of educational possibilities,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Very appropriate,1264,46,1310,,
,52%,39%,51%,,
Reasonably appropriate,701,36,737,,
,29%,30%,29%,For,80%
Neutral,314,26,340,,
,13%,22%,13%,,
Not very appropriate,47,6,53,,
,2%,5%,2%,,
Not at all appropriate,28,1,29,,
,1%,1%,1%,Against,3%
Not answered,88,4,92,,
,4%,3%,4%,,
TABLE : Q3a PAGE : 1,,,,,
New sports centre,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Definitely right,1153,49,1202,,
,47%,41%,47%,,
Probably right,744,35,779,,
,30%,29%,30%,For,77%
No opinion,115,7,122,,
,5%,6%,5%,,
Think again,160,5,165,,
,7%,4%,6%,,
Definitely wrong,97,20,117,,
,4%,17%,5%,Against,11%
Not answered,173,3,176,,
,7%,3%,7%,,
TABLE : Q3b1 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Lower Lakes,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,1203,46,1249,,
,49%,39%,49%,,
Support,798,44,842,,
,33%,37%,33%,For,82%
Neither,150,15,165,,
,6%,13%,6%,,
Oppose,26,2,28,,
,1%,2%,1%,,
Strongly oppose,33,4,37,,
,1%,3%,1%,Against,3%
Not answered,232,8,240,,
,10%,7%,9%,,
TABLE : Q3b2 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Old Cricket Pitch,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,663,31,694,,
,27%,26%,27%,,
Support,835,32,867,,
,34%,27%,34%,For,61%
Neither,371,23,394,,
,15%,19%,15%,,
Oppose,163,12,175,,
,7%,10%,7%,,
Strongly oppose,153,13,166,,
,6%,11%,6%,Against,13%
Not answered,257,8,265,,
,11%,7%,10%,,
TABLE : Q3b3 PAGE : 1,,,,,
English Landscape,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,1065,44,1109,,
,44%,37%,43%,,
Support,805,40,845,,
,33%,34%,33%,For,76%
Neither,180,12,192,,
,7%,10%,7%,,
Oppose,56,5,61,,
,2%,4%,2%,,
Strongly oppose,66,8,74,,
,3%,7%,3%,Against,5%
Not answered,270,10,280,,
,11%,8%,11%,,
TABLE : Q3b4 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Hilltop Option 1,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,953,34,987,,
,39%,29%,39%,,
Support,798,46,844,,
,33%,39%,33%,For,71%
Neither,196,18,214,,
,8%,15%,8%,,
Oppose,77,3,80,,
,3%,3%,3%,,
Strongly oppose,75,7,82,,
,3%,6%,3%,Against,6%
Not answered,343,11,354,,
,14%,9%,14%,,
TABLE : Q3b5 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Hilltop Option 2,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,706,30,736,,
,29%,25%,29%,,
Support,676,30,706,,
,28%,25%,28%,For,56%
Neither,346,27,373,,
,14%,23%,15%,,
Oppose,220,9,229,,
,9%,8%,9%,,
Strongly oppose,139,11,150,,
,6%,9%,6%,Against,15%
Not answered,355,12,367,,
,15%,10%,14%,,
TABLE : Q3b6 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Upper and Lower Terraces,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,868,38,906,,
,36%,32%,35%,,
Support,890,49,939,,
,36%,41%,37%,For,72%
Neither,278,14,292,,
,11%,12%,11%,,
Oppose,72,2,74,,
,3%,2%,3%,,
Strongly oppose,60,5,65,,
,2%,4%,3%,Against,5%
Not answered,274,11,285,,
,11%,9%,11%,,
TABLE : Q3c1 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Station Gate,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,990,40,1030,,
,41%,34%,40%,,
Support,844,37,881,,
,35%,31%,34%,For,75%
Neither,211,12,223,,
,9%,10%,9%,,
Oppose,102,2,104,,
,4%,2%,4%,,
Strongly oppose,118,18,136,,
,5%,15%,5%,Against,9%
Not answered,177,10,187,,
,7%,8%,7%,,
TABLE : Q3c2 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Penge Gate,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,942,37,979,,
,39%,31%,38%,,
Support,918,47,965,,
,38%,39%,38%,For,76%
Neither,224,17,241,,
,9%,14%,9%,,
Oppose,68,5,73,,
,3%,4%,3%,,
Strongly oppose,83,5,88,,
,3%,4%,3%,Against,6%
Not answered,207,8,215,,
,8%,7%,8%,,
TABLE : Q3c3 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Sydenham Gate,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,590,27,617,,
,24%,23%,24%,,
Support,782,27,809,,
,32%,23%,32%,For,56%
Neither,369,25,394,,
,15%,21%,15%,,
Oppose,231,11,242,,
,9%,9%,9%,,
Strongly oppose,270,21,291,,
,11%,18%,11%,Against,21%
Not answered,200,8,208,,
,8%,7%,8%,,
TABLE : Q3c4 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Rockhills Gate,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,690,31,721,,
,28%,26%,28%,,
Support,771,31,802,,
,32%,26%,31%,For,59%
Neither,339,19,358,,
,14%,16%,14%,,
Oppose,174,5,179,,
,7%,4%,7%,,
Strongly oppose,254,23,277,,
,10%,19%,11%,Against,18%
Not answered,214,10,224,,
,9%,8%,9%,,
TABLE : Q3d1 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Norwood Triangle Option A,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,392,14,406,,
,16%,12%,16%,,
Support,400,26,426,,
,16%,22%,17%,For,32%
Neither,310,18,328,,
,13%,15%,13%,,
Oppose,388,14,402,,
,16%,12%,16%,,
Strongly oppose,642,35,677,,
,26%,29%,26%,Against,42%
Not answered,310,12,322,,
,13%,10%,13%,,
TABLE : Q3d2 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Norwood Triangle Option B,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,264,11,275,,
,11%,9%,11%,,
Support,441,16,457,,
,18%,13%,18%,For,29%
Neither,363,25,388,,
,15%,21%,15%,,
Oppose,407,18,425,,
,17%,15%,17%,,
Strongly oppose,561,32,593,,
,23%,27%,23%,Against,40%
Not answered,406,17,423,,
,17%,14%,17%,,
TABLE : Q3d3 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Norwood Triangle Option C,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,253,13,266,,
,10%,11%,10%,,
Support,542,29,571,,
,22%,24%,22%,For,33%
Neither,573,31,604,,
,23%,26%,24%,,
Oppose,343,9,352,,
,14%,8%,14%,,
Strongly oppose,308,21,329,,
,13%,18%,13%,Against,27%
Not answered,423,16,439,,
,17%,13%,17%,,
TABLE : Q3d4 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Norwood Triangle Option D,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,119,2561,,
,100%,100%,100%,,
Strongly support,462,27,489,,
,19%,23%,19%,,
Support,592,22,614,,
,24%,18%,24%,For,43%
Neither,529,32,561,,
,22%,27%,22%,,
Oppose,283,11,294,,
,12%,9%,11%,,
Strongly oppose,173,12,185,,
,7%,10%,7%,Against,19%
Not answered,403,15,418,,
,17%,13%,16%,,
TABLE : DM01 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Respondents by gender and age,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2264,114,2378,, 
,93%,95.80%,93%,,
Male,1216,70,1286
,50%,59%,50%
Female,1048,44,1092
,43%,37%,43%
,Paper,Web,Total
,2285,115,2400
Under 15,55,1,56
,2%,1%,2%
15 to 25,102,6,108
,4%,5%,5%
26 to 35,688,35,723
,28%,29%,30%
36 to 45,560,45,605
,23%,38%,25%
46 to 55,388,19,407
,16%,16%,17%
56 to 65,255,8,263
,10%,7%,11%
Over 65,237,1,238
,10%,1%,10%
TABLE : DM02 PAGE : 1,,,
Respondents by ethnic origin,,,

,Paper,Web,Total
Total,2442,114,2556
,94%,96%,93%
British,1824,100,1924
,75%,84%,75%
Irish,62,,62
,3%,,3%
Other White,187,8,195
,8%,7%,8%
W&B Carib,23,,23
,1%,,1%
W&B African,8,,8
,0%,,0%
W&Asian,7,,7
,0%,,0%
Other Mixed,19,,19
,1%,,1%
Chinese,10,,10
,0%,,0%
Indian,16,1,17
,1%,1%,1%
Pakistani,3,,3
,0%,,0%
Caribbean,22,1,23
,1%,1%,1%
Bangladeshi,1,,1
,0%,,0%
Other Asian,14,1,15
,1%,1%,1%
African,18,1,19
,1%,1%,1%
Other Black,18,1,19
,1%,1%,1%
Other,26,1,27
,1%,1%,1%
TABLE : DM03 PAGE : 1,,,
Respondents by disabled and main interest,,,

,Paper,Web,Total
Total,2442,114,2556

Disabled,94,6,100,,
,4%,5%,4%,,
,Paper,Web,Total,,
, ,,,,
Recreation,1966,98,2064,,
,81%,82%,81%,,
Events,1150,22,1172,,
,47%,18%,46%,,
Sport,838,58,896,,
,34%,49%,35%,,
TABLE : DM04 PAGE : 1,,,,,
Respondents by how often use park,,,,,

,Paper,Web,Total,,
Total,2442,116,2558,, 
,95%,97%,100%,,
> once a week,677,24,701
,28%,20%,27%
Once a week,541,29,570
,22%,24%,22%
Once a fortnight,276,19,295
,11%,16%,12%
Once a month,408,21,429
,17%,18%,17%
Less regularly,330,20,350
,14%,17%,14%
Never,36,3,39
,1%,3%,2%
TABLE : DM05 PAGE : 1,,,
Respondents by how often use sports centre,,,

,Paper,Web,Total
Total,2442,116,2558
,100%,97%,100%
> once a week,174,15,189
,7%,13%,7%
Once a week,200,12,212
,8%,10%,8%
Once a fortnight,55,5,60
,2%,4%,2%
Once a month,144,9,153
,6%,8%,6%
Less regularly,634,38,672
,26%,32%,26%
Never,1047,37,1084
,43%,31%,42%
TABLE : DM06 PAGE : 1,,,
Respondents by location,,,

, ,
Total,2561, 
,100%,
Code A,4,
,0%,
Code F,29,
,1%,
Code L,1070,
,42%,
Code P,19,
,1%,
Code S,29,
,1%,
Code T,71,
,3%,
Code U,1048
,41%
Code W,23
,1%
Code I,119
 ,5%
Unknown,149
 ,6%

F,Football - Selhurst Park
L,Lower
P,Penge
S,Sydenham
T,Triangle
U,Upper
W,West Norwood
I,Internet responses